Reading about dictators
There has not been much time for reading so far this summer, so I am only just now getting toward the end of the Pol Pot biography (Pol Pot: Anatomy of a Nightmare, by Philip Short) that I picked up back in the spring.
It is quite good, as books about insane totalitarian utopia schemes go. With a subject like the Khmer Rouge, it is easy to throw up one’s hands and declare that these people are all just crazy. How else to explain the forced emptying of the cities, the enforcement of communal food preparation, the breaking up of families, and the systematic crushing of individuality?
Short, a British journalist, goes a long way towards providing answers to that question. While he clearly does not sympathize with what Pol and the Khmer Rouges were trying to do and explicitly condemns their actions and motivations, he does a good job of illustrating how and why things went so badly for Cambodia. Like many ideoloically driven revolutions, the people who began it may have had good intentions, but with their focus solely on the ideology rather than its practical effects, the situation went south quickly.
Where Short’s narrative falters, I think, is in his repeated assertions that the tragedy in Cambodia was rooted in Khmer psychology. Perhaps Khmers are, as Short asserts, inherently prone to black-and-white thinking and brutality. However, he provides little evidence to back up this claim, and makes it far too often.
That flaw aside, the book is definitely worth reading.